He is Thirsty
November 6th, 2005

He is Thirsty

The worst!Not very good.Average.Pretty good.The best! (161 votes, average: 4.59 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

^ 21 Comments...

  1. darithethrd

    reminds me of superman for some reason, i thinks it eother the costume, or the dickery that he is doing

  2. David

    Hooray for communism! I think. Maybe?

  3. Spielman

    Full of win.

  4. Chalks

    Heh… he was reading Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged.

    I’m not sure he exactly follows her ideas but, hey, pretty close. :D

    Incidentally, have you actually read that book? I enjoyed the writing, if not all the ideas.

  5. Kevin

    My Ayn Rand experience is limited to the first half of The Fountainhead. I was reading it as a part of some scholarship contest put on my people who call themselves “Obejectivists”. It was about 500 pages longer than my patience at the time, which is probably a good thing, because nerdy high school guys are susceptible to Ms. Rand’s “philosophy”.

    I guess that nowadays kids will inoculated against such tangents by their time in Rapture.

  6. Kris

    You know, Rand was not opposed to charity. Nor are most free-marketers. This is more of a nietzhe argument. Leave Rand, and the objectivists out of it!

  7. Allen

    Actually, did Ayn Rand claim that giving to charity was immoral. Apparently, the victim is the person you’re giving the charity to. Objectivists are just members of the personality cult built up around her and will agree to anything she said, no matter how outrageous and ridiculous the claim.

  8. Allen

    Oops: syntax correction. Change the first sentence to “Actually, Ayn Rand did claim that giving to charity was immoral.”

  9. jed

    How can it be a ‘personality’ cult when shes dead?

  10. Kevin Brennan

    Huh? Free market principles say enough of the sort. In fact, part of the general concept is that with more money going to individuals, charities will prosper as more people are able to donate more money to solve relevant social issues. The only part of the comic that made any sense for me was the Ayn Rand portion, even if I do love her books. I generally like these comics, but this one just confused the heck out of me because it was so off-target!

  11. Kevin Brennan

    ^Oops, typo. First line should say “nothing” instead of “enough”. My brain is playing tricks on me today!

  12. Kris

    To keep this brief- as I thumb through Rand’s news letter the intellectual activist, she very CLEARLY states..

    “I don’t discourage charity whatsoever- I encourage it; so long as the charitable giver does not destroy himself in the process”

    Please, don’t act like a shill, and confuse Rand with Nietzsche like everyone else does.

  13. Sirry

    What does everyone have against Nietzsche? He just saw charity as a means of exercising your power over them. He also saw material charity as a sign of spiritual poverty. Confusing Ayn Rand and Nietzsche is impossible for people who know anything about the meta-ethics of either person. One of Nietzsche’s major ideas was that morality is a human illusion created to control people into being happy cogs in the machine of civilization (Morality is much worse than television in this sense. If you consider yourself moral, you have plugged in and checked out more than any TV junkie). Ayn Rand believed that moral truths were empirically discoverable and objectively true.

    And if you think Nietzsche was a Nazi, please never express an opinion again

  14. Wes

    Reminds me of a superhero/villain I thought up years ago. Captain Capitalist, arch-nemesis of The Lone Communist. Too funny.

  15. Tim

    There’s a whole flash site centered around pretty much the same joke character: http://captaincapitalism.com/

  16. Sarah

    Objectivism says nothing in detriment to charitable acts so long as that charity is voluntary. The entire idea of objectivism, at least what I’ve taken from it, is that motivation and ideals should be intrinsic, self-taught. If such an ideal is to help people who can’t help themselves, then so be it. The fact remains that it is still what the individual in question *wants* to do. That is the “Virtue of Selfishness.” A lot of people get the ideas of Objectivism confused with blind, heartless capitalism. Yes, many of those who engage in the larcenous activities of modern industry could be considered “objectivists,” but that isn’t the spirit of the ideal.

  17. Eric

    Why does Free Market Man’s chin look like a huge pair of testicles?

  18. Ian

    Hahaha, Its like my friend Dave

  19. Steve

    This is stupid. Free market capitalism actually supports private charity, since it's better for people to voluntarily support others in ways they want to, rather than be forced to give up their money by a giant bureacracy.

  20. mungs

    nice

  21. Maciej Piechotka

    I guess I can be consider radical free market supporter as anarchocapitalist. PersonalyI believe that charity is an important element of volontary human interaction. As free market is volontary human interation therefore the charity is important element of free market. While being important however it cannot replace the other interactions from practical resons (the economic calculation). Communes can be part of anarchy/free market as long as participating in them is striktly volotary (anyway – the familly is sort of small communes).

    I don’t know objectivism very well but AFAIK they held very different opinion on this matter . It’s perfectly ok as long as they not try to force me to use my resources in way I want (for example sharing them with others).

    As far as “virtue of selfishness” is concerned. IMHO the original use of this metaphor is that on free market the selfishness want of making profit plays along so-called social interest as the only way of making profit on free market is satisfing consumer wants.

) Your Reply...